Advice: use your mouse to so change the size, shape and location of the window with this story, that it reassures for you the best visibility of the story and it fulfils your preferences for reading. In order to change the size and/or the shape of this window, "catch" it with the mouse by any wall, or by right bottom corner, and then drag it in the required direction. In order to change the location of it, just catch it by the blue top strip and shift into a new location on the screen. Use SCROLLBAR on the right side to scroll the text as you read it.

Part #A: Introductory information of this web page:

#A1. What is the goal of this web page:

The goal of this web page is to explain the least known to people methods of God's action, e.g. to explain "why God tolerates suffering", "why some people die already in young age" - i.e. when they had no opportunity yet to do something wrong, etc., etc.

Part #B: Introduction to key questions of people:

#B1. Why it is worth to seek answers to questions regarding methods of God's acting:

Motto of this web page: "When we really love our God and creator, then we want to know the whole truth about Him."

The most popular argument of atheists against God states that God does NOT exist, because if God existed then there would be NO pain and suffering in the world. But it is enough to think of putting ourselves in God's position and consider how we would react then onto behaviours of some people whom we know, to immediately understand, that this argumentation is empty. Therefore, in items marked below #1, #2 and #3, I am going to explain in many different ways, why the existence of pain and suffering in fact more confirms the existence of God, than contradicts this existence. After all, pain, suffering, death, etc., are tools in hands of absolutely rightness God, that allow Him to serve the justice. The first out of items below (marked #1) repeats the story with an emotional explanation of an anonymous author, which story someone posted to me via one of these "chain emails" that these days circulate around the world. In turn remaining items #2 and #3 result from findings of the philosophy of totalizm and from the theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity. So here is one of the best popular explanations of why God allows pain and suffering that I have seen:

Part #C: The explanation "why God tolerates pain and suffering?":

#C1. A story which explains emotionally reasons for pain and suffering - circulated in one of these "chain emails":

A man went to a barbershop to have his hair cut and his beard trimmed.

As the barber began to work, they began to have a good conversation. They talked about so many things and various subjects. When they eventually touched on the subject of God, the barber said: "I don't believe that God exists."

"Why do you say that?" asked the customer. "Well, you just have to go out in the street to realize that God doesn't exist. Tell me, if God exists, would there be so many sick people? Would there be abandoned children?

If God existed, there would be neither suffering nor pain. I can't imagine a loving God who would allow all of these things." The customer thought for a moment, but didn't respond because he didn't want to start an argument. The barber finished his job and the customer left the shop.

Just after he left the barbershop, he saw a man in the street with long, stringy, dirty hair and an untrimmed beard. He looked dirty and unkempt. The customer turned back and entered the barber shop again and he said to the barber: "You know what? Barbers do not exist." "How can you say that?" asked the surprised barber. "I am here, and I am a barber. And I just worked on you!" "No!" the customer exclaimed. "Barbers don't exist because if they did, there would be no people with dirty long hair and untrimmed beards, like that man outside."

"Ah, but barbers DO exist! That's what happens when people do not come to me." "Exactly!" affirmed the customer. "That's the point! God, too, DOES exist! That's what happens when people do not go to Him and don't look to Him for help. That's why there's so much pain and suffering in the world."

(anonymous author)

#C2. A scientific explanation "why God created pain and suffering", which results from findings of the philosophy of totalizm:

The emotional explanation presented above in item #C1 realises in an illustrative (although highly simplified) manner realises one amongst reasons for which God sends cataclysms, problems, illnesses, suffering, pain, etc., to people and communities which practice the immoral philosophy of parasitism. In a more scientific manner these reasons are explained by the Concept of Dipolar Gravity and by the philosophy of totalizm with the use of evidence presented on the totaliztic web pages named day26.htm and seismograph.htm. Notice that the above story to be less complicated simply suggests that in order to avoid suffering and pain in our lives we should turn to God. On the other hand research documented on the abovementioned web pages named day26.htm and seismograph.htm. reveal, that in reality for avoiding suffering and pain it is not enough to e.g. be religious and to pray to God, but we must lead our lives exactly according to God's requirements. (Means, we must live pedantically morally - as with the use of ancient language it is ordered by the Bible, while with modern justification it is explained by the philosophy of totalizm.) As this is clearly documented with the research described on the abovementioned web pages, God mercilessly punishes every person and every community which gives up to temptations of the immoral philosophy of parasitism - even if this person or community is highly religious and it continually prays to God. Simultaneously - as this is documented in item #I3 from the totaliztic web page seismograph.htm, even atheists are rewarded by God - if only they lead their lives morally, means according to indications of the Bible or the philosophy of totalizm. In turn already documented verifications of the moral lives prove, that a group of at least 10 so morally living people (i.e. "10 righteous"), stops arrivals of any cataclysms, and even just bad weather, at the area on which they live.

Part #D: Least understandable for people principles of God's action result from the fact, that "God knows future" and thus knows what each one of us is to do before it actually is done:

#D1. Otherwise than people, "God knows future", and thus what God does today always stems, amongst others, also from what is to take place in the distant future:

       Although previous explanations revealed why adult people are affected by pain, suffering, illnesses, death, etc., they do not explain why the same is affecting even very young children, which sometimes suffer, and even die, still in very young age. After all, such very young individuals do NOT know yet about the existence of God, do not know yet how to pray, and did not do yet anything for which God could punish them - because it makes impossible the implementation of God's plans. They even are unable to distinguish between immoral and moral. So let us explain now why such small children are also affected by pain, suffering, illnesses, death, etc.
       Along the path of people through their lives, all events have exclusively chronological character. Furthermore, people do not have insight into the future. For these reasons, when e.g. someone is born, or when still is young, then people do NOT know yet whom this someone becomes when is already an adult. On the other hand, God is in a completely different situation. God created the world in such a manner that time has a software nature - as this is explained best on the web page named immortality.htm. Namely, time actually can be defined as the so-called "execution control" in human so-called "programs of life and fate". In turn people themselves, similarly like present computer programs that are just running, never know what is to happen in the future. But God is in the situation of a "programmer" who has in front of him the entire such a program, and thus who can check what exactly is going to happen both now and in the distant future. So if God sees that some people are going to do in the future something that is to drastically obstruct the implementation of God's plans, then God either terminates life of such people a long time before they do their evil deeds that put into jeopardy the God's plans, or God makes such people to become handicapped - so that they are unable to implement whatever they intended to do in the later parts of their lives. (Of course, because of the need to respect the so-called "canon of ambiguity" described on the web page will.htm, God is forced to so camouflage His all actions, that these God's actions appear to be accidents, random events, acts of forces of nature, etc.) This is why some people die young, or become handicapped already in young age.
       As we know, for everything that is true, there is also appropriate body of evidence which confirms it. For example, a very simple experiment described in items #D1 and #D2 of the separate web page named immortality.htm is able to prove to everyone with a sufficiently open mind, that time is really a natural program implemented in jumps (similarly like present computer programs do), not a kind of river that flows around us - for which a river the time is considered by present scientists. On a similar principle, one can also find various evidence which documents that God treats people already during their youth with various events that are highly righteous reflection of whatever these people are to do in their mature age. One amongst examples of just such evidence is the regularity experienced in many lives, that whatever happens to people during the youth is actually shaped by what these people are doing during their mature age. Of course, not every person has the intellect capable of understanding that whatever we do as adults, in fact decides about what happened to us when we were young. After all, people think in categories of chronology. So everything that is earlier they consider to be a cause, while everything that comes later they consider to be an effect. However, God sees all times at once, thus everything that people do at any time and it bears significant consequences to other people or to God's plans, for God becomes a cause, while the effect which represents the reaction of God to this cause is implemented by God at any moment of time which from the God's prospective is the most suitable - frequently much earlier than the flow of human time arrives to the cause of that particular reaction of God.

#D2. The explanation "why God tolerates death and injuries of youth", which results from the finding that "God knows future" accomplished by the theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity:

       The fact that "God not only knows future, but also in every His action that He takes, God considers what is to happen only in distant future" for many people is NOT known nor obvious. This is why these people whose intellects are unable to understand such capability of God, that effects of someone's actions are to be served in an earlier time than causes - e.g. an illness or a harm can be served to someone already during a youth, for what this person is to commit only in the adult age. However, even such people who do NOT know or do NOT accept the knowledge of future by God, also feel in their lives a kind of "supervision" or a sort of someone’s "care" over their fate. It means that they notice that their lives in young ages were looking as if controlled by someone in such a way that in their adult age could happen whatever actually has happened to them. But in reality the situation is completely reversed. In reality God first checks what a given person does during the entire his or her life, and only then God so directs his or her life that the doing of this person agrees with intentions and plans of God. This is the reason for which we all should be very cautious as to whether what we do as adults, is really agreeable with requirements of God, because whatever we do in our adult age is going to impact what is happening to us during our young years.
       Environments in which accidents of youth are happening are also a highly meaningful evidence, which confirms the reasons explained here for which young people are affected by pain, suffering, illnesses, death, etc. If one analyses these environments, then he or she is to discover, that the most disasters happens to youth which is born in the environment that we know perfectly as the one which breeds highly immoral adult people that are to lead lives which contradict the God's requirements. For example, most of suffering children is in Africa and in countries that are known from practicing the highly immoral philosophy of parasitism (e.g. in Pakistan, Indonesia, Philippines, New Guinea, Samoa, etc.). Simultaneously it is also known to us, that in the same Africa and in countries which practice that immoral philosophy of parasitism, the most of children grows up into political tyrants, terrorists, pirates, rapists, exploiters, cheaters, etc. Similar situation is with children from families of drinkers, drug addicts, homosexuals, etc., and also in families of highly rich people - which do NOT apply in life the ordered in the Bible principle that "children should be brought up like steel is hardened" - for more details see explanations from item #B5.1 from the web page named will.htm and from item #A3 of the web page named god_proof.htm.
       There are also examples of other evidence, which seem to confirm the thesis that whatever happens to young people in fact is dictated by what these people do in their mature age (or what they would do - if they could live so long). Fates of some known to me people with disabilities seem to imply that these are just such examples. If we learn exactly the entire fate of a person with a handicap and we analyse this fate under the angle described here, then usually turns out that we discover something about them, that certifies either unwilling, or premeditated, doing in their adult age bad deeds which drastically run against rules of behaviour given to us by God (i.e rules which in an ancient language were written down in the Bible, while in a modern language are described by the philosophy of totalizm). But because typically we do NOT know entire lives of all people with disabilities, we are not able to decide whether fates of those whom we know, are exceptions or just repetitive rules. For example, I encountered in my life handicapped people which committed suicides, gave various immoral examples to other people (e.g. become addicted to something), publicly cursed at God (committed blasphemy), etc. Of course, if we look chronologically at lives of such people, then we could claim that whatever they did was the result of them being handicapped. But if in fact we look at them in a timeless manner, as at people God looks, then the fact that they become handicapped in their young age, can also be the consequence or an effect of whatever they committed in their adult age. I wonder whether, if the reader could e.g. analyse the content and consequences of the book described in the article "Hawking: discoveries leave no place for God", from page B1 of the New Zealand newspaper named The Dominion Post (issue dated on Friday, September 3, 2010), then whether the reader would consider this book to be an example which confirms the thesis explained above?
       A completely different kind of evidence that God sees all times at once, and thus that the moment when God serves to someone an effect is chronologically independent from the moment when a cause appears, is the God's rule that to these people who believe in something so strongly, that they are prepared to act on this belief, God always provides evidence in support of their belief. (This rule is described and explained more extensively in item #F1 of the web page named rok_uk.htm, and also in subsection A16 from volume 1 of my newest monograph [1/5].) As it turns out, such a confirming evidence frequently is served to these people already after they started to believe strongly into something, and after they acted upon this their belief. (E.g. many people first starts to believe strongly into demons, spirits, UFO, Yeti, monsters, etc., and only later God makes that these people encounter of whatever they strongly believe in.) On the other hand, the human principle of "cause and effect", which is based on the chronology of the elapse of time, would need to have this effect, that first these people should see the evidence on something, and only then they could begin to strongly believe in it.

Part #E: Further vital methods of God's actions towards people:

#E1. The principle of God's action which states that "no matter how far from truth are someone's strong beliefs, God still is to provide this person with evidence which is to confirm the correctness of his or her believes":

Another principle which wise God uses in His interactions with people, is that "if someone believes in something enough strongly to act on the basis of that belief, then this person should receive evidence in confirmation of that belief, even if it is untrue". This principle has the goal to inspire people to creative searches, to exchange of ideas and to sticking to own beliefs, to searches for truth, and in total to the accomplishing the main goal for which God created man, which is to "increase knowledge". It is due to the strict implementation of this principle, that people who e.g. strongly believe in ghosts actually do see ghosts, people who believe in UFOs, demons, or monsters, do see UFOs, demons, or monsters, people who believe in indications of divining rods and pendulums, actually receive correct information from these indications of pendulums and rods, for people who strongly believe in dreams or specific superstitions, these dreams or superstitions do work in practice, the entire human science which believes in past existence of dinosaurs on the Earth, continually digs out "bones of such dinosaurs", etc., etc. Because of the existence and work of this principle of God, we can state that .
The principle of God's action towards people described here is also discussed quite extensively on a number of other web pages and publications by the author. Therefore, if someone wishes to study it more deeply, he or she should look into item #A2.2 from the web page named totalizm.htm, to item #F1 of the web page named rok_uk.htm, or to subsection A16 from volume 1 of the newest monograph [1/5]. In turn that erroneous belief of the entire present "atheistic orthodox science", that "bones of dinosaurs are proof that on the Earth dinosaurs actually lived in distant past", is discussed, amongst others, in item #F2 below on this web page, item #D3 of the web page stawczyk_uk.htm, items #C1 to #C4 of the web page named prawda_uk.htm, and almost the entire web page named evolution_pl.htm.

#E2. Since God implements the principle that "no matter how far from truth are someone's strong beliefs, God still is to provide this person with evidence which is to confirm the correctness of his or her believes". so how we can distinguish true existences from inspiring "fabrications of God":

The principle of God's actions described above, to always "fabricate" evidence which confirms strong beliefs of every person, causes that the reality that surrounds us is filled up with a significant number of manifestations, which actually do NOT exist permanently and physically - as permanently and physically e.g. people exist. So the scientific and philosophical problem which emerges from the existence of these "God's fabrications" is "how to distinguish whether something exists permanently and physically, or just is one amongst these temporary 'fabrications of God' ". As it turns out, the philosophy of totalizm indicates to us a method of such a distinguishing. This method states that whatever exists permanently and physically can be detected and confirmed objectively from every possible approach to research. In other words, such as the existence of us, people, and also the existence of the planet Earth, Sun, Moon, chemical elements, water, trees, crops, etc., can be confirmed at every possible manner, and with every approach to research (especially for the approach "a priori" and simultaneously approach "a posteriori"), everything that it is possible to detect and to confirm with all known manners, also "exists permanently and physically". In turn whatever can be detected and confirmed only subjectively on one amongst several [possible manners, but it remains "undetectable" for other approaches to research, is just a "temporary fabrication (simulation) of God".
According to the above definition, God's fabrications are for example UFO vehicles and UFOnauts, and also Yeti, Nessie, spirits, demons, fata morgana, and a whole array of other temporary manifestations. This is because they can be confirmed only with the "a priori" approach to research. On a similar principle the "God's fabrications" turn out to be also for example "dinosaurs", "Big Bang", "black holes", and a whole array of other forms and objects confirmed only subjectively by the official "atheistic orthodox science" to-date and only with the "a posteriori" approach to research.

Część #F: Where hide further, similar to the above, replies to questions about God:

#F1. Why the humanity is to be punished by errors and by detrimental effects of the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date, until the time of recognising, official establishing, and public financing of the newly-born "totaliztic science":

Motto: "The degeneration of fruits is a proof of degeneration of the tree that yields them, while the degeneration of the humanity is the proof of degeneration of science and education."

Starting from 1985, means from the date of development of the theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity and the philosophy of totalizm, practically two completely opposite and mutually competitive kinds of science do exist on the Earth. The older one exists since almost beginnings of time. Until present days it become the "official science of the humanity" and gained an absolute "monopole for knowledge and for education". Some call it the "atheistic orthodox science". In the fate of humanity it fulfils a similar role like a "snake head". Namely, similarly like in case of a snake - wherever its head goes also the rest of body is to follow, in case of the humanity wherever the official science directs itself, also soon the entire humanity is to land. Thus the "degeneration of the humanity" which we currently see around ourselves, is actually the result of the "degeneration" which in the meantime paralysed the deprived any "competition" official human science.
A completely different science was born from the developed in 1985 theory called the "Concept of Dipolar Gravity" and from the "philosophy of totalizm". This one is called the "totaliztic science". But the reason why hardly anyone has heard about it, is that for the last over quarter of century, this old "atheistic orthodox science" continually "silenced the voice" of the newly born "totaliztic science". In turn, by "silencing the voice" of the new "totaliztic science", the old official science also silences truths, and deprives humanity the right to a second half of correct knowledge, which the old science is NOT able to see because of the bans, limitations, and the overgrowing with deviations. Only in most recent times, the creation of internet, allowed the new "totaliztic science" to begin avoid publishing-barriers that this old science imposed on it, and thus begin to reveal at least some amongst its numerous "eye-opening" accomplishments. So it is about the time we learn these.

#F1.1. The "atheistic orthodox science" to date is like a "castle on ice" deprived of foundations, chocking the truth, and gaining profits from its "monopole for knowledge" and from lies which it spreads:

The official human science to-date carries out all research starting from the approach which in philosophy is called "a posteriori", means "from effects to causes" - as this is explained in item #A2.6 of the web page named totalizm.htm and in item #C1 of the web page named telekinetics.htm. In addition, this science has so-far the absolute monopole for knowledge, because it did NOT have any official "competition" in the form of a publicly recognised different research and educational institution which similarly like it would be financed from taxes of people, but which would research the reality from an opposite philosophical approach called "a priori", means "from the cause to effects" - as only a "competition" would force the official science to "earn for living by generating results". Somehow it so happens, that in "a posteriori" approach to research, it is extremely difficult to detect and to prove the existence of God. In addition, holding the "absolute monopole for knowledge" together with personal ambitions and psychological state of various most influential scientists, make it impossible to even consider the possibility, that in the universe does exists a superior being, such as God, which "knows more on every possible subject" than present scientists know. As the result, this official human science to-date, with the elapse of time lost completely interests in respecting the possibility that after all "God does exist". It also adopted officially the so-called "Occam razor" (also known as "Ockham razor"), for its most important "funding assumption". The "Occam razor" was introduced to the official philosophy of human science by a medieval philosopher named William Occam (born in 1285, died in 1349) - means in times when the Catholic Church was "multiplying devils which sit on a pinhead", thus to maintain the rationality the science needed a "test for absolute necessity of consideration of a given entity". This is why that "Occam razor" orders that "entities are not to be multiplied beyond absolute necessity". Unfortunately, with the elapse of time that "Occam razor" caused the "pouring a child together with the bath", because together with "devils", "angels", "imps", etc., it also "removed" God from the science. Thus, that setting the philosophical foundation of the human science on the "Occam razor", transformed the science into an exclusively "atheistic institution". It is so, because people received from God the so-called "free will". In turn, the very definition of this "free will" states that God "can be" considered in life and in research, but there is NO "absolute necessity" for His considering and for recognising Him. In the result, this "Occam razor" forced the science to-date to atach to everything that scientists do, the unwritten claim that "God does NOT exist", which actually is contradictive to the merit of "free will" and to the existing evidence. In this way the science fully deserves the name "atheistic orthodox science" which it receives from investigators forced outside of its official stream. So although with the elapse of time some scientists started to literally "trip" over increasingly more numerous cases when "the evidence confirms the existence of God" - such as the evidence described on the web page named god_proof.htm, the official "atheistic orthodox science" started to openly ignore that evidence, or hide it and pretend that it does NOT exist at all.
Unfortunately, the life of all so-called "intellects" (means the life of everything that leads "intelligent lives", i.e. people, families, entire science, governments, politicians, entire countries, etc.) is ruled by the law that "intellects which do NOT have opposition nor competition which would force them to continuously fight for the survival, with the elapse of time are overgrowing with deviations thus transforming themselves into so-called parasitic intellects, and then they begin activities which are exact opposite to the ones for implementation of which they were established originally". (This law is also explained in item #M1.3 from the web page telekinetics.htm and in item #A4 of the web page named god_proof.htm.) It is just because of the action of that law, that for example unmarried women with the elapse of time acquire "behaviours of spinsters". It is also this law that with the elapse of time turns almost every government and almost every politician deprived the "opposition" and "competition" into a "corrupted tyrant and a persecutor of its own nation". The action of this law caused, that until today this "holding the absolute monopole for knowledge" and deprived of any competition "atheistic orthodox science" acquired the increasingly more deviated behaviours of a "religion without God", thus instead of "bringing progress", for some time now it started to act exclusively as "breaks for the progress". Until the present time the function of the "atheistic orthodox science" as "breaks for the progress" intensified so much, that this science already started to act for the detriment of entire humanity - the best proof of which become events connected to the explosion of atomic reactors from Fukushima in Japan, described more comprehensively in items #C7 and #I1 of the web page named seismograph.htm and in items #M1 to #M1.3 of the web page named telekinetics.htm.

#F1.2. The newly born "totaliztic science" is like a "political prisoner" that emerged from knowledge and truth, sacrificed his life for the progress, but is chained, deprived the right to speak, and forgotten by the society for the good of which it suffers:

Fortunately for the humanity, almost simultaneously with "going to dogs" of that old "atheistic orthodox science", God allowed that on the Earth was born a new "totaliztic science" which leads research from that so-far ignored approach called "a posteriori", means "from the cause to effects". The wider description of this newly born "totaliztic science" are provided in item #A2.6 of the web page named totalizm.htm and in item #C1 of the web page named telekinetics.htm. In turn the founding publication for that new "totaliztic science", is the newest monograph [1/5]. The general "cause" in research of this newly-born "totaliztic science" is God, while the "effect" is the "reality which surrounds us". Therefore, this new "totaliztic science" is the first science on the Earth, which by using modern tools and methods of science, researches God, and researchers the reality from the point of view of God. As such, it is so needed "competition" for the "atheistic orthodox science" - thus starting from the time it was born it "watches hands of official science" and forces it to start fight for the survival - similarly as before that "atheistic orthodox science" forced to fight for survival both, the newly born "totaliztic science", as well as the scientific theory and philosophy on which this "totaliztic science" was founded (means the so-called Concept of Dipolar Gravity and the philosophy of totalizm).
The "totaliztic science" already exists and already works practically since 1985. For example, this web page, as well as all web pages and monographs indicated in the "Index of content with links" from item #I2 below, are the manifestation of official accomplishments of it. Of course, because it was born relatively recent, it still must fight for its place in the society, and also fight for receiving the official access to the public financing and public education - which so-far were granted only to the monopolistic "atheistic orthodox science". After all, until the time when it receives its own share in the public financing for research, and until it will be able to open its own schools and universities, the "totaliztic science" will be forced to act "underground" and fight for the survival with the "atheistic orthodox science" which tries to destroy it and disallows it to speak publicly. Therefore, the "totaliztic science" counts here that also you, the reader, contributes your own support and effort, to officially establish it and publicly finance it - as a new official science and as so needed official "competition" for the old orthodox science.

#F2. While the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date is like a "castle on ice" deprived of foundations, the newly born "totaliztic science" has solid, strong, wide, and correct scientific and philosophical foundations:

       If one analyses thoroughly the matter of scientific and philosophical foundations of the science, then it turns out, that the only foundations on which rests the entire huge structure of the to-date "atheistic orthodox science", is that "founding assumption" called the "Occam razor" (i.e. the one that states "entities are not to be multiplied beyond necessity"). What even more interesting, the "Occam razor" stands in the obvious contradiction to our "free will", and thus also to the reality. After all, the principle of "free will" states, that "in everything that people do, they have a right to choose this alternative, which they consider to be right and true". On the other hand, the "Occam razor" forbids to people leading research that run along one amongst two existing and perfectly recognised approaches, i.e. it forbids to research the reality from the "a priori" approach ("from God to reality around us") - allowing to research the reality only from "a posteriori" approach (i.e. "from effects to causes"). All other theories and findings of the "atheistic orthodox science" to date (apart from that "Occam razor") are "effects" of acting according to that "razor" - thus they cannot be considered to be "foundations" of the science. And so, for example so-called "natural evolution" is only an "effect" agreeable with that "razor" rejection by the science the possibility that everything was created by God. In turn the so-called "Bog Bang theory" is also only an effect of the rejection by this science the "process of creation of the physical world" by God. No wonder, that such "resulting" scientific theories still contain in themselves so many holes and inconsistencies, such as for example the claim of the "Big Bang theory" that "the entire universe originates from nothing" (this claim is explained more comprehensively in item #C12 of the web page named bible.htm and in item #E1 of the web page named will.htm), or the claim of "natural evolution" discussed in items #E1 and #E2 above that the existence of petrified "bones of dinosaurs" is a proof that dinosaurs really lived on the Earth in past, not just a "fabrication" by God discussed in item #E1 above, which was to inspire people to "searches for knowledge". (Interestingly, while pursuing the claim that "dinosaurs existed objectively because people encounter petrified bones of dinosaurs", the same official human science "practices double standards" and refuses to also recognise, that the existence of "UFO photographs" and "people abducted to UFOs" should certify as well that UFOs and UFOnauts exist equally objectively, the same as these dinosaurs existed.)
       But if we analyse scientific and philosophical foundations of the newly-born "totaliztic science", then it turns out that these foundations are incomparably more solid, wide, and true from scientific and philosophical foundations of the to-date "atheistic orthodox science". For example, scientific foundations for the "totaliztic science" provides the theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity - the correctness of which is indicated by an entire ocean of already identified and confirmed evidence. In turn philosophical foundations of the "totaliztic science" is the entire huge philosophy of totalizm which for the increasingly larger group of people proves in practice its absolute correctness.
       In total, the comparison of quality and extensiveness of foundations for both these sciences turns out to be highly disadvantageous for the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date - which seems to be a "science without true foundations" (i.e. the science which "hangs in mid-air" or which is like "a castle erected on ice"). No wonder that this science is so afraid a "competition" in the form of newly-born "totaliztic science", that it uses the entire its power and the entire its authority, to "silence" and to hold back the arrival of "totaliztic science" which is based on truth and on really existing solid foundations.

Part #G: The new "totaliztic science" provides replies to practically all vital questions:

#G1. Let us seek answers of the "totaliztic science" to the basic questions:

In spite that the new "totaliztic science" still is NOT officially recognised, that all its research it carries out without any official funding, and that it is brutally persecuted and silenced by the old monopolistic "atheistic orthodox science" to-date, its scientific contribution is already enormous. Until today it provided to us replies to thousands immensely vital questions. So if the reader wishes to learn these replies, then it is enough to have a look at totaliztic web pages devoted to the subject area that he is interested in, listed in Menus. Especially it is worth to learn replies of this science contained on web pages of such names as: god_proof.htm, soul_proof.htm, ufo_proof.htm, seismograph.htm, or immortality.htm.

#G2. Monograph [1/5] as a scientific report with outcomes of to-date research on God accomplished by the newly born "totaliztic science":

Until the time when the "totaliztic science" was born, there was NO objective scientific research, which would attempt to really get to know God scientifically. On the other hand, when one loves his (or her) God and creator, one feels as to get to know Him much better. Fortunately, the development of the theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, and the philosophy of totalizm enabled the author of this web page to research God with the use of modern scientific methods and from the abandoned previously by the official science point of view that "God does exist". Results of this "pro God" research on God are combined into my monograph marked [1/5] - which can be downloaded from Internet free of charge. So if you really wish to learn what at this stage of research is scientifically known about your God and creator, have a look at this monograph [1/5] - starting from its volume 1.

Part #H: Let us NOT be afraid to direct questions to our professors - after all their salaries originate from our taxes!

#H1. Is it fair, that we have so many excellently paid professors financed from our taxes, but the most vital amongst our questions still remain unanswered?

       Each one amongst us is torn apart by thousands of questions, the knowledge of replies to which could potentially change our lives. For example: "has the science any proof to confirm its official claim that 'God does NOT exist'?", "are any official scientific research in order to explain what actually are manifestations of ghosts?", "is there really a link between the morality of victims of cataclysms and ill-fortunes that affect these victims?", "does living untouched churches and temples in the middle of areas completely ruined by various cataclysms is justified by laws of probability?", "does the 'group morality' of the city of Wrocław (or the city in which we live) already now displaying the similarity to a 'group morality' of present city of Christchurch in New Zealand or to ancient cities of Salamis, Pompeii and Vineta, and whether Wrocław (or our city) is endangered by a similarly destructive cataclysm?", "does the 'theory of big bang' mean that the science officially claims that the universe originates from nothing?", "is there only one explanation for the existence of 'bones of dinosaurs' and must the existence of these bones necessary mean that dinosaurs really lived in past on the Earth?". Etc., etc. Unfortunately, for some reasons citizens typically are afraid to direct these questions to professors from universities, in spite that high salaries of these professors are paid from taxes.
       If we analyse the professional duties of all taxpayer-funded workers, then it turns out that independently from their basic role, their duties include, amongst others, widely understood "service to the society". After all, these jobs belong to a general group of "social services". For example, independently from university professors, to the same category belong fire-fighters, police, army, health services, politicians, etc., etc. Each one amongst these jobs has NO right to refuse giving us occasional UNPAID service, if such a service is needed by us. For example, apart from extinguishing fires - that is the main duty of fire-fighters, they also have a duty to pump for free water from our cellar if it is flooded by a deluge, or to take down from a tree top our cat or child - if these unwisely climbed in there and do NOT know how to get down. Similarly police - apart from chasing criminals and giving us speeding tickets, it also has a duty to, free of charge, e.g. lead blind persons onto the other side of busy streets, to pilot women just giving birth to nearest hospitals, or to explain to strangers how to get to required addresses. Etc., etc. The same principle obliges also university professors. If we have specific short question that spoils our life, then we have a right to ask this question to any professor currently employed in the area that this question concerns - e.g. by emailing this question directly to him, while this professor has the duty to reply this question free of charge. In turn, if any professor ignores such a question and refuses to reply, then we have a right to repeat this question via a newspaper, radio, or television, subjecting simultaneously to a public discussion whether that particular professor deserves the salary paid from our taxes.
       The only matter which so-far is still ambiguous in the matter of such questions, is where finishes the duty of professors to provide free of charge replies to questions posted to them, and starts their right to firstly negotiate a payment before they provide a reply. (It is worth to notice here, that according to principles of "fair trading", such a payment they would need to negotiate before they provide a reply, and that they have no right to issue a possible bill if the person asking questions do NOT agree beforehand to pay for receiving an answer.) The point is that for some questions which require long research in order to provide a reply, such as specialist questions of commercial value asked by the industry, before providing a reply universities may state a condition that they prepare a reply only if beforehand they receive a specific payment. Fortunately, to this matter applies the "principle of being reasonable". Namely, if is asked just a short question from the general area in which a given professor specialises, while the reply to this question can take e.g. the form of a single word YES or word NO, then NO professor has the right to insist on receiving an additional payment before he provides a reply. Therefore, when formulating such a single question to university professors, it is important to set it in such a way, that the reply to it can be expressed with a single word YES or word NO. Of course, the actual reply to this question is NOT going to take a form of just such a single word, because in such a case the reply - if it is e.g. published in a newspaper or in internet, is going to induce public outrage and would expose a given professor to ridicule. But the sole fact that the question is so formulated that it can be replied with a single word, causes that it would be highly immoral to either refuse to reply it, or to request by a given professor an additional payment for preparing a reply.
       The above information should be complemented with the explanation, that the matter of directing questions to university professors currently in office, is equally comprehensively discussed in (3) from item #L3 of the web page named pajak_jan_uk.htm. It explains, amongst others, how practically one should carry out directing, via emails, questions to professors currently in office. So perhaps the reader should benefit from these guidelines.

Part #I: Summary and the final information of this web page:

#I1. The summary of this web page:

This web page provided examples of answers to questions that concern the least known to people methods of God's action. It also revealed to us some benefits that stems from seeking and finding replies to such questions.

#I2. Emails and contact details to the author of this web page:

Current email addresses of the author of this web page, i.e. Dr Jan Pajak (while for the duration of 2007 - Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak), at which readers can post possible comments, inquiries, or replies to questions which I ask on my web pages, are provided on the web page about me (Dr Eng. Jan Pajak). That page also provides my postal address and telephone numbers.

Copyrights © 2011 by Dr Jan Pajak. All rights reserved. This web page is a report from outcomes of research of the author - only that is written in a popular language (so that it can be understood by readers with non-scientific orientation). Ideas presented on this web page (and also in other publications by the author) are unique for the author’s research, and thus from the same angle these ideas were NOT presented by any other researcher. As such, this web page presents ideas which are the intellectual property of the author. Therefore, the content of this web page is the subject to the same laws of intellectual ownership as every other scientific publication. Especially the author reserves for himself the credit-rights for the scientific discoveries and inventions described on this web page. Therefore, the author reserves that during repeating any idea presented on this web page (i.e. any theory, principle, deduction, interpretation, device, evidence, proof, etc.), the repeating person gives a full credit to the author of this web page, through clearly explaining that the author of a given idea is Dr Jan Pajak, through indicating the internet address of this web page under which this idea was published, and through mentioning the date of most recent update of this web page (i.e. the date indicated below).

* * *

Date of initiation this web page: 5 October 2010.
Date of the most recent update: 17 May 2011.

English: If you prefer to read in a different language, click on the selected flag or green link below
Po polsku: Jeśli preferujesz czytanie w odmiennym języku, kliknij na wybraną flagę lub zielony link poniżej

In English

index.htm

Po polsku