What's Wrong With
"Mr. Scott's Guide To The Enterprise" by Shane Johnson
------------------------------------------------------
By 'James Dixon' copyright 1991
Page  Comments
----  --------
12    First of the incorrect F**A/Spaceflight Chronology dates. The Enterprise's
      5-year mission came to an end in the 2260's (2265 by "tech fandom"). NOT
      in 2212, over 50 years early...
      The stardate of the end of the 5-year mission conflicts with the stardate
      given in the beginning of "The Lost Years."
      "Mr. Scott's Guide" claims the Enterprise was the only Constitution class
      ship to return--all others were lost or destroyed. This conflicts with all
      other "tech fandom" which explaines that the remaining Constitution
      class ships were upgraded. The only ships of the Consitution class to be
      lost by the end of the Enterprise's 5-year mission were the Valiant, Con-
      stellation, Intrepid, and the Defiant (though not technically of the Con-
      stitution class--see Tech Manual). The Farragut (mistakenly listed as de-
      stroyed) was also uprated and was in service in the 24th Century (TNG
      novel: "The Captain's Honor").
      The "Guide" states that the Enterprise was 25 years old. All "tech fandom"     
      as well as "The Making of Star Trek" and "Star Trek Log 7" state that the      
      Enterprise was over 40 years old. The Valiant was lost on a voyage to
      Eminiar some 50 years back indicating the age of the Constitution class.
      Unfortunately, the TNG "Tech Manual" gives her commissioning date as 2245
      --not too keen on researching the facts...
      Now comes the heavy duty F**A: Leeding Engines Ltd. (company invented by
      F**A that makes warp engines) and the naming of the Enterprise's engines
      FWG-1 nacelles (stands for 'F'ederation 'W'arp engines, look up chart 'G'
      and naturally the Klingons call their engines KW-- and the Romulans RG--)      
      There's also mention of FWF-1 engines and Shuvinaaljis--another company
      that makes these engines. All used strictly in gaming, not in reference
      works...
      The "Guide" goes on to say that impulse drive is used to propel the ship
      through warp space, despite episodes like "The Corbomite Maneuver" which
      clearly indicate that impulse and warp are two seperate propulsion systems     
      Jesco Van Puttkamer in "The Making of Star Trek-The Motion Picture" states     
      that a reaction to the warping of space propels the ship, which is the
      whole principle of the warp engines.
      The bottom of the page has a photo of the Enterprise in "Drydock Facility
      Three (July 2216). Not only is the date wrong, but Spacedock 4 was
      employed for her upgrading in "A Flag Full of Stars."
13    Here, the "Guide" states that the Enterprise's computer was an M-4...
      In "The Ultimate Computer" Kirk asks Daystrom why the M-5 was not called
      M-4 or M-1. The answer is that Multitronic units M-1 through M-4 were
      failures. M-5 can be added to the list. "Tech fandom" states that the
      old Enterprise had a Duotronic computer which is quite consistent with the    
      episode and Daystrom's Duotronic Breakthough.
      The page also mentions another F**A contrived company: Daystrom Data Con-
      cpts. Probably the most acceptable of contrived company names. As well
      as Kloratis Drives. "Tech fandom" uses the names Daystrom Duotronics and
      Cochrane Warp Dynamics.
      This computer was supposedly replaced with a "central core shaft 8 feet
      in diameter" which extends through the entire saucer section, as opposed
      to being housed on 2 decks at the center of the ship. Doesn't seem very
      logical, it appears in only one "tech fandom" product: Ships of the Star
      Fleet's USS Belknap class strike cruiser cutaway. Though in retrospect,
      with TNG's Enterprise using computer cores, and the NCC-1701-A Deck Plans
      employing same, perhaps it should be accepted.
      The F**A gaming name for the impulse drive in use is mentioned here too:
      FIE-2 (yes, you guessed it: 'F'ederation 'I'mpulse 'E'ngine...).
14    Here's Shane Johnson's description of the new "untested defense system,
      verified by computer, chosen to protect Enterprise from whatever hostile
      action she might encounter:
      "In this new technology, a coil of diburnium-osmium alloy was placed with-     
      in a reinforced titanium/transparent aluminum mount, scanned at the sub-
      atomic level, then replicated and projected as energy at an adjustable
      point beyond the vessel's outer hull. This energy layer, acting as a
      solid, in effect became another layer of metal on the ship's exterior.
      Insulated from the true hull by a small space, the invisible shield was
      designed to replenish its 'molecular' structure continually for as long
      as source energy was available."
      Just goes to show how much of an imagination he has, as well as how much
      he understands science, or in this case at least, the science of the Trek
      Universe.
      The second half of the page describes the Enterprise's destruct system and     
      it's two modes which Johnson claims are selected by the last words, either     
      "destruct one" for antimatter containment shutdown or "destruct zero" for     
      detonation of charges. Thing is, we've never heard the first statement.
      Line Officer's Requirements Manual (again, "tech fandom") explains that
      self-destuct will always be the second scenario unless the safety inter-
      locks on the antimatter bottles are removed, in which case when destruct
      reaches 0 the force fields will cancel out. This explanation neatly
      explains why Kirk orders Scotty to arm the self destruct system in Engine-     
      ering in both "One Of Our Planets Is Missing" and ST-TMP to ensure the
      destruction of the intruder. In fact, it's the only explanation.
      The remaining bottom of the page, as well as the next five pages, are
      accurate specs from Andrew Probert, chief designer of the Enterprise model     
      and were published in the ST-TMP blueprint pack shortly after the release
      of the film. "Tech fandom" agrees with these 100% except for Leeding FWG-1     
      tagged on to the Nacelles description from Johnson's F**A gaming sources.
18    Note that the bow and stern views of the Enterprise are NOT drawn to
19    the same scale as the three previous drawings.
20    This page shows an original, cutaway of the Enterprise, showing her
      computer core extending through the primary hull and a tractor beam
      extending out of the base of the secondary hull--yet there's nothing
      in the previous external views of the ship to suggest a tractor beam
      extending from the base. "Tech fandom" states it was relocated below
      the forward torpedo tubes, where a very visible "shutter" can be seen.
      Sources: Files of Star Fleet Command and Line Officers Requirements.
      However, in the old Enterprise, this was the location of the tractor
      beam. Also take note of the turbolift shafts--they Do Not match up with
      the shaft display grid first seen in ST-TMP and every other film through
      ST III to feature the Enterprise. The navigational deflector monitor is a     
      station located behind the forward tractor beam shutter.
22    Preproduction sketches of the aft topside of the primary hull. Fine ex-
      cept for mentioning F**A's Chiokis Starship Construction Corp. and the
      date of 3 Jun 2212--over 50 years before ST-TMP.
24    Duty Uniform screwups: It's a very popular myth that each ship in the
      fleet has its own unique uniform insignia. "Court Martial" proved this
      wrong with Kirk meeting "old friends" on Starbase 11, complete with
      arrowhead shaped insignias. "The Eye of the Beholder" also has the crew
      of the USS Ariel wearing identical insignias. Lack of space prevents
      full explanation of the system in use here. The Technical Manual clearly
      shows that the arrowhead is the standard insignia worn by Star Fleet
      Armed Forces. Star Fleet Merchant Marines ("Pirates of Orion"), Science
      Probe/Survey vessel personnel ("Charlie X") and flag officers ("The Dooms
      day Machine") wear other insignias. This has always been the case in Star
      Trek, despite misinformation from Trimble's otherwise excellent Concordan-     
      ce, and F**A. I guess this is why Johnson and co. decided to blow up all
      other Constitution class ships--in order to justify a "change" in insignia     
      Too bad that the TNG "Technical Manual" also suggests that the Enterprise
      insignia was adapted after the 5-year mission instead of individual ship
      insignias. Well, if you ever wondered where misinformation comes from...
      Dates here are, as always, way off. Also note Johnson's dismissal of the
      ST-TMP uniforms: while he illustrates the ST II design he completely
      neglects them, no doubt because he does not understand the color-coding
      and ranking systems. These are exhaustingly outlined in the "tech fandom"
      Federation Reference Series, covering all ST-TMP uniforms, with illust-
      rations of each one being more pleasing to the eye than Johnson's typical
      "coloring book" quality drawings of uniforms on the next few pages.Though
      they Are better than the shoddy uniform drawings in the Line Officers
      Requirements Manual...
31    Service Bars. There has been quite a bit of talk about how these
      slashes and pips add up. While Johnson's explanation seems sound, it
      does not hold up with the actual arrangements worn by our officers in
      ST II and onwards. McCoy and Chekov would have served in Star Fleet
      for the exact same number of years! And even as late as ST VI, they have
      not changed by one pip. We've come to the conclusion that the pips and
      bars worn on the sleeves represent commendations and citations earned
      by the officer, and not service length at all (despite what the constume
      designers preliminary notes say, as indicators of service lengths, they
      do not hold up at all).
32    Typefaces: more F**A dates plus an outright false statement that the
      Star Fleet banner was red and yellow and painted on starship hulls.
      To be exact, the banner is silver on red as seen in "And The Children
      Shall Lead" and in the Technical Manual. Johnson is describing the
      Star Fleet identification pennant, also seen representing Star Fleet
      Command, hanging on walls in the background of Star Fleet H.Q. whenever
      commodores decide to chit-chat with Captain Kirk...
      The typestyles are fine except that there is at least one page of
      typefaces missing, representing interim ship lettering used between
      the series and films.
42    Johnson claims that the sphere located on the ceiling in the center
      of the bridge is a "navigational sensor input system," which transmits
      all input from the sensor dome above to the astrogator console
      below via laser. This does not seem very bright, considering that
      the commanding officer will constantly obstruct the data pulses as
      he enters and leaves the con. Lawrence Miller's Bridge Blueprints say
      this globe is a Colission Sensor Alarm Strobe. In ST III it seemed to
      function very much like a lamp, perhaps an alternate mode of the warning
      strobe.
43    Here we see a typical Johnson drawing. It is of the bridge. It lacks
      the professional style of Franz Joseph and others and the numbering of
      stations listed on the Opposite page is not needed. As all his drawings,
      it's scaled in feet as opposed to the traditional "tech fandom"
      metric scale. It is overly simplistic with emphasis on between-wall
      bulkheads than in proper labeling with no use made whatsoever of shading
      in selected portions. Between the turbolifts and the outer hull are
      large unlabeled spaces--for what? If for piping/wiring he could have
      indicated so. What's also troubling is the lack of an inspection corridor
      or crawlway around the bridge perimeter, included in the Miller prints.
      All previous starship bridges contained such an access, even the new
      Galaxy class ship ("Brothers"). Then there's a curious "emergency
      hatch" lodged in the deck just in front of the helm which I don't
      recall seeing any indication of, although the NCC-1701-A prints have a
      service tube that may lead to a hatch. The "rotating" portside turbolift
      something else new to us. He also deliberately ignores mentioning the
      original bridge layout seen in ST-TMP which differed drastically
      from the ST II layout by station locations. No explanation is given,
      as if the Enterprise of the movies has always had one bridge design...
44    Basically the same as page 22.
45    Basically the same as page 22.
48    Johnson claims B Deck to be the "main security level." This runs contrary
      to all "tech fandom" and The Making of Star Trek book which describes the
      old ship's deck 2 as consisting of science labs and such. However, "The
      Enterprise Incident" has Mr. Spock escorting the Romulan Commander to
      Deck 2. I suppose there could be a security facility on the new ship there    
      but placing such a facility directly under the main bridge is asking for
      trouble!
      The only real complain regarding the V.I.P. Officers Lounge layout
      is a slight difference in the preproduction sketch vs. Johnson's.
      The spacing between the privacy area viewing screens and sunken
      observation area is double what it should be.
50    Meal Service. "Nutritech Corporation" designed food processor. Nice
      name, did it come out of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy?
      The old ship also did not rely entirely upon "mini-turbolifts" as
      Johnson suggests. The "food processor" also resembles something out
      of 2001: A Space Odyssey or perhaps Alien, not Star Trek. It is
      overly complex in design, unlike the cartridge activated ones of the
      original series or the voice activated units seen in "The Practical
      Joker" and TNG: display screens, special beverage dispenser bins,
      tray disposal slot, trash disposal slot, utensil bins... The units
      we have seen only required one lone dispenser. Also disturbing is
      Johnson's naming it a "food processor unit," he never once refers to
      it as a food synthesizer as in the old series. It looks like a step
      backwards in design...
52-57 Here's Johnson's idea of shipboard living quarters. Oddly, they
      seem to be fusions of the quarters seen in ST-TMP and ST II.
      Details of both layouts seem to be missing, but with greater
      emphasis on ST II's designs. Junior officers quarters and crew
      quarters also seem more cramped and uncomfortable than ever before,
      possibly due to the redesign. Particularly disturbing is that the
      only way to reach the toilet is to walk through the sonic shower
      booth! I doubt their accuracy. The "dining booth module" is also some
      thing completely new to me--and completely lacking in the 1701-A Deck
      Plans.
58    Turbolift Car. This page makes use of Shane Johnson's famous human
      outline for scaling purposes. At a first glance the drawing looks fine,
      but at a second glance, there are problems. First, turbolift cars as
      illustrated in "tech fandom" prints and manuals, as well as seen moving
      through tubes in ST-TMP, are more rounded on the top and bottom. Second,
      the turbolift starship layout locator grid panel is missing. Lastly,
      the right side elevation suggests that the car number plate & maintenance
      crew door controls are a part of the turbocar when they are in fact a part   
      of the wall/corridor and are stationary! Johnson seems to be suggesting
      that the wall and all move with the car...
60    The Main Gangway Hatch differs from what we see in the films. Johnson
      decided to jazz it up a bit and so added two hatch windows, manual hatch
      controls, and even a Star Fleet insignia.
62    Again, a disappointing drawing due to Johnson's amaterish style, this time    
      of the Auxiliary Control Room. Although, this time, he chooses to contain
      the station numbering to one page, the drawing could easily be improved
      by selective shading and the addition of more detail. For a page of this
      size, simple circles and blocks for chairs and stations are unacceptable.
      The Emergency Life Support System room, for instance, is given the label
      and an interior of 4 unexplained circles. The 1701-A Deck Plans also don't    
      make use of this layout.
63-65 His corridor drawings are better. Unfortunately he goes Too far. I find it     
      hard to believe that while the corridors have been halved in size,
      they've been lined with survial suits and compartments, not to mention
      "food, communications, and waste management facilities for one crew
      member." The idea of the blinking display panels hanging from the corridors
      being "personnel locator displays" is a neat idea, all Trek films which
      feature Enterprise corridor activity clearly proves this one also wrong.
67    Again, an over-simplistic drawing, this time of sickbay. Unfortunately,
      taking into account the FJD drawings of the old Enterprise's sickbay, this   
      drawing simply CANNOT be the whole of sickbay, especially for a complement     
      of 500 persons. We are shown one lab, one examination room, and one
      intensive care unit. The 1701-A Deck Plans fare better, using only the
      basic (screen-accountable) layout and doubling it in size.
68-69 The standard 6-person transporter. This is what the page should be called,    
      as in all other tech books. Instead: Transporter Room. Here, as with the
      living quarters, we are shown a fusion of the ST-TMP and ST II designs and    
      not one, the other, or both. ST-TMP, ST II, and ST III suggests that both
      these rooms are in use, as the design of ST-TMP resurfaces in ST III as
      our officers abandon ship.
      "A redesigned field generator matrix is mounted into the rear wall..." Thi     
      is also something new. All drawing of transporter rooms simpy call the
      wall a "protective barrier."
      More seriously: "In the new system, transporter energies are transmitted
      and received from any of several transmission points on the outer hull.
      These points, less than two feet across, are protected by seperate deflec-     
      tor shield units which allow beaming to take place while the remainder of      
      the ship is fully protected. This feature is particularly valuable during
      combat situations." Indeed it would be a valuable feature, unfortunately
      no such system exists as has been proven time after time and more recently      
      in ST V. Although less than 2 feet across, they would still show up on the      
      most detailed of outboard blueprints and obviously don't.
70-71 The jackets illustrated here are clearly better drawn than in the Line
      Officer Requirements Manual, but again the given dates are incorrect and
      the splitting up of colors is annoying. He also doesn't include the
      jackets worn in ST III...
72    Johnson's communicator drawing, while neatly labeled for a change, is not
      100% true to the screen version. We also see another of Shane Johnson's
      consistent inconsistancy trademarks here: the "velcrite pad" on the back
      of the communicator. Dating back to the beginning of "tech fandom," the
      pad has always been called a "magnatomic adhesion surface." Johnson
      either deliberatly ignores this fact or has never studied the Technical
      Manual...
73    Here the same is true of the Tricorder. It is not all that consistent with      
      the model seen in the films. It also contradicts the "tech fandom"
      drawings based on info from the Technical Manual.
74-77 As with the deflectors, Johnson feels that the diburnium-osmium alloy of
      "That Which Survives" is the ultimate alloy in use aboard the Enterprise
      and is used in the bulkheads of the armory. What ever became of rodinium,       
      the hardest substance known to Federation science? Or tritanium or tri-
      titanium (used in starship hulls), or even a thin coating of neutronium?
      He then goes on mentioning the tenth anniversary of phasers, Transtator II      
      physics and other such fluff, topped off by the usual incorrect years.
      Then invents another company, Atalskes Phaser Corporation (F**A?), and
      Sestra Weapons.
      Then there's his drawings. Here, he not only contradicts the production
      sketches, the Technical Manual phaser data, the "tech fandom" phaser
      drawings, but also his OWN phaser drawings in his "Weapons And Field
      Equipment Technical Reference Manual" (not wholy Star Trek, but featuring
      the best Johnson tech drawings I have ever seen)!
      First off, is Phaser IV. The numbering alone is disturbing. The palm pha-
      er (regardless of model or generation) was always known as Phaser One or
      Hand Phaser Type I, and the interlocked pistol configuration as Phaser Two      
      or Hand Phaser Type II. He calls the ST-TMP pistol a Phaser IV when a
      more logical name would be Phaser II-A. In his previous "Manual," Johnson
      calls the rear disc the lock release for the Phaser I unit. Here, he calls      
      it a dilithium crystal housing--as it's stated in production sketches and
      is consistent with "tech fandom." On the Phaser One unit are the settings
      and here he blows it badly. In the classic Technical Manual, the 4 basic
      phaser settings are Stun, Heat, Disrupt, and Dematerialize. The production      
      sketches drawn by Probert of the Phaser setting keys indicate that these
      4 settings are selected by the 4 keys on the left, two "tech fandom" draw-      
      ings agree with this, Johnson has them in this order from top to bottom:
      Stun Select, Disrupt Select, Dematerialize Select, Enter Key! This goes
      back to His old "manual" where the user operates the phaser like a comp-
      utr, keying in the exact intensity level and such. The buttons on the
      right are fine, but in his original "manual" they are labelled Setting
      Intensity Select, Power On/Off, and Safety. Then in error he splits the
      fire button into two halves (a throwback to his "manual" where it's used
      to select wide and narrow beams. There is ONE button, it's the trigger for      
      the Phaser One unit), the lower blackened area is a Thumb Rest he states,       
      in his earlier work it was the "Phaser Three Trigger". You can see how
      confusing this is, how he's tried to cover his mistakes and has made more.      
      Personally, having read the original one and only Star Fleet Technical
      Manual, I thought it blind obvious that the four buttons running down
      the left corresponded to the four settings. Another thing is the Phaser
      One unit. In his "manual" it plugs in BACKWARDS into the Phaser Two unit,       
      with a shutter falling down to seal off the Phaser One barrel (facing the
      operator) and another barrel which is used when operating seperately...
      His Phaser IIB is just as bad. He seems to be changing things as he goes
      along. The only correct control in common between with this phaser model
      illustrated in his two references is the Trigger! In his first "manual"
      The area above the trigger is split into two sections for selecting wide        
      and narrow beams. Below the trigger is a silver safety button. A force
      setting wheel is inset on the BACK of the phaser (just above the "velcrite      
      pad"). In the "Guide": the beam width switches are an "energy focusing
      matrix" and below the trigger on the left is a beam force setting switch        
      and on the right is a switch for beam width. In his "manual" when inter-
      faced with the Phaser Two unit, special switches mounted on the right side      
      of the grip serve to lay in the settings, a "speed setting" system--which
      although mentioned in the "Guide" is noticably missing from the drawing!
      The "tech fandom" drawings assume a flat control layout almost identical
      to the ST-TMP phaser. On all phasers, Johnson calls the side-mounted grid
      lines Heat Sinks, unfortunately for him, in the classic Tech Manual they
      are deflector shield grids. I seriously believe that Shane Johnson had
      never seen the Tech Manual at the time of these drawings.
78-79 Here, Johnson only draws the lower level of the Rec Deck. It lacks the
      usual detail (No Shading!) and the individual games and facilities
      provided should have been named and labeled. I'm also not too sure about
      the male and female rest rooms. There never before was any seperation of
      sexes between rest rooms on the old ships. They were smaller one-man
      cubicles. What of "sexless" beings?
82    "Housed within the connecting dorsal, between H and I Decks, is a three-
      feet thick hull seperation system layer. This unit uses magnetic
      repulsors to widen the initial gap between the seperating hulls." Here's
      more imaginative speculation. If such a system does exist I don't believe
      that magnetic fields would be employed, more like tractor beams set to
      repel.
      He goes on to say that the dorsal section on decks I, J, and K houses
      special passenger cabins for non-Humanoid passengers. All the prints
      on the older vessels state that these are observation lounges. The
      Enterprise class is a heavy cruiser like her predecessors, not a courier
      ship although it may function as one from time to time, 3 decks reserved
      for exotic non-Humanoid passengers may be going a bit too far... This
      is especially true when one considers the limited room in the dorsal
      areas. Unlike in the Constitution class, the intermix chamber runs
      through the dorsal decks which must be well-shielded, not to mention the
      turbo lift shaft and an emergency "ladder tube." The "Guide" also adds
      a Jeffries Tube running along the aft end of the dorsal. The 1701-A Deck
      Plans more logically allocate various engineering support systems to these      
      dorsal decks, as well as the traditional observation lounges shoved in...
      Johnson continuously calls Photon Torpedoes "Photorps." Again, can't he
      stick to normal terminology? Again he adds more F**A talk: companies,
      dates and such. He calls the torpedo in use a FP-4 torpedo (yeah, stands
      for 'F'ederation 'P'hoton...) and even brings in the Arcturus Firing
      Range from Space Flight Chronology. He suggests that 7% of all launches
      were aborted by an overheating auto-arming system so that's why it was
      replaced with manual loading. Reading between the lines, he also states
      that the Enterprise in ST-TMP fired the same torpedoes as in the old
      series. They DON'T look the same...
83    The torpedo handling is done by magnetic carriers, the "Guide" says.
      Magnetics are a thing of the past in Trek, aside from magnetic bottles
      for antimatter storage, magnatomic fields are in use. Too bad that the
      TNG "Technical Manual" sticks to plain Magnetics rather than Magnatomics.
83    "At the rear of L Deck, surrounding the Jeffries tube, is the photon
      exhaust system. Whenever a torpedo is fired, the mechanism forcefully
      ejects superheated gases aftward through a vent matrix in the outer hull,       
      this countering the inertial forces created by the departing photorp."
      Nope. Never. That's why the ship has reaction-control thrusters for
      attitude control. Files of Star Fleet Command, Starship Design, USS
      Menahga layout sheet etc. all state otherwise. When the magnophoton
      force field of the torpedo comes in contact with the neutronium-lined
      launch tube, radioactive gas is released which must be disposed of.
      This was one reason for the relocation of the photon torpedo banks to
      the dorsal section, the other reason was a cancelling effect upon the
      deflector shields of the locallized section of the ship during firing.
      The photon exhaust vent IS an EXHAUST vent, thus the name. "Matrix" is
      also another one of Johnson's annoying "filler" words: this matrix, that
      matrix... Always something-matrix.
84    Again, Johnson fails to give us a complete drawing. The dorsal section
      is not very thick, he could easily have drawn the whole section but
      didn't. The 1701-A prints show this Torpedo Deck as doubled in depth:
      one bay for each tube. Logical, especially (as noted in the prints) the
      torpedo bay was destroyed in one scene of ST II, making Spock's space
      burial scene impossible if it weren't for another Torpedo Room (the one
      adjacent to it). Instead, Johnson flanks the chamber with a storage bay
      and lounge.
85    Photorp [Mark VI]. What's wrong with "Photon Torpedo" and "Mark VI" sub-
      titled? Magnetic loading plate should be "magnatomic adhesion loading
      plate." Then he deliberately makes up "duranite casing." There's duranium
      (from "The Menagerie Part I") but not duranite. In ST III, the screen
      clearly said that the casing was composed of terminium. Yeah, the drawing
      is rather lacking. Drawing the shell a bit smaller would have enabled a
      cutaway view showing the internal arrangement of the torpedo--which would
      have been a first. Too bad. The scale in feet at the bottom of the page
      also appears to be slightly off. The equivalent photon torpedo drawing in
      the Line Officers Requirements Manual, while unspectacularly drawn, is far      
      more informative: Just one page and we have 14 different spec listings as
      well as top and side views.
87-88 Disappointing "Warp Engine Room" should be called "Main Engineering Deck"
      except Johnson only draws a small section of it. As usual he ignores the
      layout presented in ST-TMP, not even mentioning the changes and additions
      added on except for the "dilithium reactor room" which should be termed
      "main energizer chamber." There's talk here about "dilithium couplings"
      and radiation hazard. It's almost apparent that Johnson knows little about      
      the purpose of the chamber. Line Officer Requirements Manual is needed to
      get any understanding of this. He also adds that the transparent wall
      contains "radiation dampening gases." Why not use a force field barrier
      to contain the radiation? It works fine on the old life support belts.
      "Systems status display consoles" is also hardly adequate for explaining
      seven large consoles--why not label each one independently and their
      functions?
      Only antimatter is contained in magnetic bottles. Line Officers Require-
      ments states that it's integrated with neutronium pellets (which explains
      the "neutronic fuel carrier" in ST II, despite the fact that the original
      Constitution class vessel integrated matter plasma generated from H2.
92    "At the forward end of the deck, on either side of he vertical intermix
      shaft, are twin energy converter units. These large, rounded devices
      translate the shaft's raw matter/antimatter power into a form which is
      usable by the vessel's shipboard systems, thus providing electricity and
      field energy for daily use." Wrong. The dilithium crystal converts--trans-      
      tates--the raw radiation into electrical energy. It functions as an energi      
      zer, gauging the amount of energy to be fed to other shipboard systems.
      The 1701-A Deck Plans allocate this forward region to a thruster control
      room for the secondary hull's forward RCS, energizer, and subspace nav-
      igation unit (no doubt tied into the space-energy field attraction sen-
      sors mounted around the external hull at this region)...
94    Again: Chiokis and bad dates. Then Johnson starts fabricating. The warp-
      sled shuttlcraft in ST-TMP for instance he claims is propelled by an
      "advanced magnetic field drive." It does explain why it needed the warp
      sled, but it was Designed to incorporate the sled.
      "Four shuttle craft are carried aboard the Enterprise. These are numbered       
      One, Three, Five, and Seven, and are named for famous astronomers of the
      past: Halley (1), Herschel (3), Copernicus (5), and Galileo (7)." Quite
      wrong on the numbering (why not sequentially? 1, 2, 3, 4?) and also wrong
      on the individual numbers and we saw in ST V.
95    Shane Johnson's modified Warp Sled shuttlecraft. He added "humps" onto the      
      aft port and starboard sides which supposedly house the "magnetic drive
      units."
96-97 No problem here on these Travel Pod drawings, not suprising since Johnson
      didn't draw them (thus the details!). He got them from the ST-TMP blue-
      print pack, which modern "tech fandom" of the 80's is based upon...
98-101Nothing wrong here, again with these sketches, as before they are from
      Production. Just that the release dates and "Patterson-Massey" add-ons
      aren't needed here. It's also a shame that Shane didn't mention the latest      
      Bee module designed by Star Fleet: the Killer Bee assualt craft utilizing
      a slightly modified Work Bee interfaced with a skate-like propulsion pack/      
      weapons pod...
102   Major discontinuity here. The description of the lifeboats in the "Guide"
      as being one-man pods "for those persons who are unable to reach the pri-
      mary hull before emergency seperation takes place" is illogical. There
      are only 8 of these units, for 8 people. 8 out of 500... The Line Officers      
      Requirements Manual spends several whole pages discussing the lifeboats.
      Lifeboats, not escape pods as Johnson's concept should be named. Each of
      these boats, once deployed, can house up to 60 persons for 30 days. They
      are employed when the primary hull structure is damaged beyond its ability      
      to make a safe planetary landing. Space limits a detailed description of
      them here but they are essentially immense versions of the Personal Rescue      
      Enclosure "rescue balls" currently carried aboard NASA space shuttles.
      Except these are capable of achieving planetfall. The Starfleet Dynamics
      Manual (and consequently the 1701-A Deck Plans) have these lifeboats re-
      placed with an upgrade, the ELSE-6 units which house At Least 2 people
      and fall away from the ship through thin-hull blow-away panels. They're
      located on all the major decks, well over 100 of them. The TNG "Tech
      Manual's" lifeboats are based on these.
103   See 102!
104   See 102!
105   See 102!
112   Here comes the NCC-1701-A rot. The Constitution class was launched in 2217      
      not the Enterprise class. Again: 50 years. Again, F**A again with the
      Salazaar shipyards. More damaging: the false statement that the Transwarp
      drive is based on the discovery of the interphase in "The Tholian Web."
      The Transwarp principle, according to Line Officers Requirements, is based      
      upon the harnessing of a wormhole's effects. Johnson claims that "intri-
      cate warp and transporter field matrices" are used to generate a doorway
      through dimensions. F**A at least has the guts to say it straightout:
      that Transwarp is done by beaming the warp field in front of the ship by
      transporter beam!!
      More F**A shipyards are named including a new engine for roleplaying
      purposes: FTWG-1 (yes, 'F'ederation 'T'rans'W'warp...). There's even more
      rot about two shipyards building transwarp engines: one for the larger
      Excelsior and one in the Enterprise class nacelles. Even though it was
      obvious in ST III that the Transwarp drive was still quite experimental.
      Even though Gene Roddenberry and the TNG technical staff all agree that
      the Transwarp drive project was a failure. Johnson then outdoes himself
      by making up the name USS "Ti-Ho" which was chosen to be the host ship for      
      the new transwarp and was renamed "Enterprise" following ST III...
      The "tech fandom" explanation: the USS "Levant" was to be the class ship
      of the new Levant class heavy cruiser, externally identical to the old
      Enterprise class but incorporating all new systems. With the destruction
      of the Enterprise, the ship was renamed Enterprise and the class named
      Enterprise (II). The ship has a more refined warp drive system, NOT trans
      warp, but can achieve warp factor 13 as maximum warp. Johnson also adds
      the names of the ships Saratoga II and Kitty Hawk out of F**A which tested      
      the new "M-6 Mark II" computer performing pefectly. Then why was there a
      massive computer breakdown in ST V? The "tech fandom" explanation is that
      the Duotronic IV computer system was installed for the first time aboard
      NCC-1701-A and a peripheral interface failure was responsible for the
      shipwide malfunctions...
113   Taking the cheap way out, Johnson just used the same bridge drawing from
      page 43, improving on it by incorporating the station names to match up
      with the numbers. The only difference otherwise: "structural supports"
      added around the bridge perimeter.
114   Another bad date, even though it happens to be my birthday (minus the year      
      ). Johnson also types "time-speed breakaway factor." It's light-speed
      breakaway factor as stated in "Assignment: Earth." There's more bunk about      
      Transwarp being so far pefected that the ship has Transwarp radio. Then if      
      things aren't bad enough, he goes on to say that NCC-1701-A has an AFT
      torpedo tube, which it clearly does not. The USS America, Enterprise (II)       
      class ship, illustrated in Ships Of The Fleet shows what she would look
      like with aft tubes: they would mirror the forward tubes and wouldn't be
      invisible.
      The remaining 7 pages of bridge screen graphics were provided by Mike
      Okuda who is presently responsible for the graphics on ST:TNG. One would
      believe that these pages are accurate and that the references to Trans-
      warp on pages 122 and 123 represent conclusive proof that NCC-1701-A has
      Transwarp. Both Okuda and technical illustrator Rick Sternback of TNG
      claim the graphics were altered by Johnson for the "Guide." Since this
      is the case, it's not known how accurate the remaining graphics are...